ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF CHANGES IN THE TERMS AND THE ORDER OF CONDUCTING ELECTRONIC TRADING PROCEDURES ON THE METHODOLOGY OF JUSTIFICATION OF THE INITIAL MAXIMUM PRICE OF THE STATE CONTRACT

  • Khusei Akhmatov Ivanovo state University of chemistry and technology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9428-1450
  • Oleg Konovalov Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Keywords: electronic trading procedure, government contract, life cycle contract, initial price, purchase of an indefinite volume, municipal order, pricing factors, anti-dumping measures, unit price, market analysis, unified trade aggregator, electronic platform

Abstract

The paper reveals the facts of changes in the methodology for justifying the initial maximum price of a state and municipal contract due to the optimization of the conditions and procedure for conducting electronic trading procedures. The reasons for the expansion of pricing factors in the conclusion of life cycle contracts are indicated. The cases of the permissibility of concluding long-term contracts in domestic practice are clarified. The authors assessed the demand for life-cycle contracts in Russia, identified the risks of exogenous and endogenous nature in the event of such contractual obligations. The paper focuses on the importance of the formation and justification of the unit price of the customer's needs when placing a state and municipal order without specifying the specific volume of goods, works, and services. The authors touch upon the problem of discrepancy in the opinions of control and supervisory authorities and state and municipal customers regarding the possibility of determining the volume of needs. Changes in the procedure for confirming good faith in the implementation of anti-dumping measures are analyzed. Recommendations on the state project of optimization changes in the procedure for forming and justifying the marginal price in the contract system have been developed. Measures for risk-oriented management of the procedure for justifying the maximum contract price are related to: identifying information provided by participants in respect of whom an application for inclusion in the register of unfair suppliers is being considered; obtaining information from persons whose legal status cannot be confirmed from open sources of information and databases belonging to state authorities; sources of information, the content of which does not correspond to the functional, technical and operational needs of the customer, specified earlier in the official requests prepared and sent for obtaining price information 

References

Federal Law N 44-FZ of 05.04.2013 "On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, and services for State and Municipal needs". "Rossiyskaya Gazeta", N 80, 12.04.2013 (in Russian).

Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation N 1087 of November 28, 2013 "On determining the cases of concluding a life cycle contract". 9 December 9, 2013 N 49 (part VII) of Article 6430 (in Russian).

Order of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation of October 2, 2013 N567 " On approval of Methodological recom-mendations for the use of methods for determin-ing the initial (maximum) price of a contract, the price of a contract concluded with a single supplier (contractor, contractor)". "Journal of the head and Chief Accountant of Housing and Communal Services", number 1, January, 2014 (part II), in (Methodological recommendations-beginning), "Journal of the Head and Chief Accountant of Housing and Communal Services", number 2, February, 2014 (part II), in (Methodological recommendations - end) (in Russian).

The draft Order of the Ministry of Finance of Russia "On approval of Methodical recommendations on the use of methods for determining the initial (maximum) contract price, the price of the contract concluded with a single supplier (contractor, performer), the initial unit price of goods, works and services" (as 05.08.2020) (prepared by the Ministry of Finance, in project ID 01/02/02-19/00088851) (in Russian).

Akhmatov Kh. A., Konovalov O. A. Comparative analysis of foreign practice of substantiating the initial maximum contract price in the system of placing a state order. // News of higher educational institutions. Series: Economics, Finance and Production Management. 2020. N 4 (46). pp. 41-47. (in Russian).

Gertsik Yu. G. A new model for improving the quality of service: life cycle contracts for the purchase and maintenance of medical devices. // Health Care Manager. 2020. N 5. рр. 54-59. (in Russian).

Drogovoz P. A., Garina I. O. Analysis of transaction costs in life cycle contracts in the machine-building industry. // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2020. N 9 (122). pp. 1105-1111. (in Russian).

Zdanovskaya L. B., Tkachenko V. V. Tkachenko N. A. Analysis of the public procurement system and consideration of practical issues of the contract system under Federal Law N 44-FZ. // Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2020. N 2 (37). pp. 117-123. (in Russian).

Kazantsev D. A. The future of the contract system. // Budget accounting. 2020. N 9 (189). pp. 56-60. (in Russian).

Lykova E. S. Contract system in the field of procurement as a tool for ensuring the economic security of the state. // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2020. N 8 (121). pp. 62-64. (in Russian).

Mityashin G. Yu. Life cycle contract: advantages and risks for key stakeholders. // Legal adviser in construction. 2020. N 7. pp. 73-79. (in Russian).

Polshkov R. D. The problem of procurement of indefinite volume. // State order: management, placement, provision. 2019. No. 57. P. 84-87. (in Russian).

Tasalov F. A. Simplification of state and municipal procurement: review of changes in the contract system. // Economy and law. 2019. N 7 (510). pp. 3-13. (in Russian).

Trefilova T. N., Glikman A.M. Procurement in conditions of uncertain volume: difficulties of law enforcement. // State order: management, placement, provision. 2019. N 57. рр. 74-83. (in Russian).

Tsygankov S. S., Nalivayko S. V., Tsygankova E. M. Ensuring contract execution in the context of digitalization of the contract system in the field of public procurement. / Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2018. N 7. S. 169-173. (in Russian).

Unified information system [Electronic resource// URL: www.zakupki.gov.ru (date accessed: 10.02.2021). (in Russian).

The Federal Treasury of Russia [Electronic resource] // URL: https://roskazna.gov.ru/ (date of access: 11.02.2021). (in Russian).

The Federal Antimonopoly service of Russia [Electronic resource] // URL: https://fas.gov.ru/ (date of access: 10.02.2021). (in Russian).

The Ministry of Finance of Russia [Electronic resource] // URL: https://minfin.gov.ru/ru/ (date of access: 10.02.2021). (in Russian).

Akhmatov Kh. A., Astrakhantseva I. A., Kutuzova A. S., Votchel L. M., Vikulina V. V. Harmonization of banking business models with the needs of the economy by stimulating exogenous social responsibility. / Quality - access to success. 2020. Vol. 21. N 174. pp. 81-87.

Published
2021-03-31
Section
ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP. DIGITAL BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION